I do not want to question the good work done by Wikileaks, directed by Julian Assange, non-profit organization lucrofondato by human rights advocates, journalists and others, but I want to start thinking that the purpose hannopermesso to flood the network with more than 250,000 documents.
I ask again, but chimai can read them all? And how long can serve perverificarne, whenever possible, even if only a small part.
They probably do because soffocarel'investigazione left with a huge amount of information that is technical, ormairiconosciuta, creating difficulties, doubts, suspicions esospetti over everything and everyone?
We note that for good news percentualesono already known to many and certainly did not need to disclose a confidential "cable" a U.S. embassy to know that Berlusconi is still up inpiedi a tardi per festine di vario tipo o che Ghedaffi si fascortare da amazzoni. Oppure che il presidente Chavez gli stia sullescatole o che Zelaya non stava rigando diritto.
Una cosa emerge subito, che è facile e poco costoso per gli StatiUniti screditare un Primo Ministro di un paese amico, ma poco servileagli interessi USA. Basta rendere noto un “segret cable” dai toniirrispettosi, per mettere zizzania e al massimo ti bruci l'addetto stampa di unaambasciata.
Si è voluto poi dare un certo senso di segretezza a notizie di basso interesse, giusto un po' sopra allo gossip, maritenute, tra la gente, profondamente vere, magari solamente per averne già sentitoparlarne o perché easy-to-insight.
risultapiù easy to switch among these other, intentionally false, and believe them true, that influence not only public opinion but also politicians and governments.
Among the first to arrive, we read "According to released yesterday by the website Wikileaks, some American papers reported that North Korea to Iran avrebbeconsegnato 19 missiles capable of hitting the capitalieuropee and even Moscow. ", then transformed into anti daqualche euphoric" North Korea is gradodi also affect Europe. "
And I wonder if this is true, when they thought they tell us? And again, but just enter "According when released yesterday by the website Wikileaks, alcunidocumenti ..." followed daqualsiasi boiata to be credible?
Eadesso c ow can we distinguish between the really ricavatedal site in question with other developed around a doc?
(to follow)
0 comments:
Post a Comment